Ayn Rand,
creator of the philosophy of Objectivism, which is based on the concept that reality exists as an objective absolute (and a surprisingly radical individualism); of which I have not read anything, but who seems to have been very radical indeed; just compare this TV interview, originally broadcast in 1959, with today; and keep in mind that her books were also read, or so it seems, by quite a few people.
View the Mike Wallace Interview with Ayn Rand, 1959
In this interview, she deplores self-sacrifice, which makes man a “sacrificial animal” in the real and in the religious sense.
[Notice how she speaks generally of "man"; which, in her context, self-evidently envelops women without mentioning - and therefore separating - them (from mankind); and, in those years, neither she, nor indeed her male interviewer, would ever have dreamt of doing so, as that would have made the whole interview completely baseless; especially as she is being intellectually roasted to the utmost, even accused of calling into question the very foundations of the society she lives in, while giving way not the fraction of an inch; and this in an atmosphere of mutual respect (if at all, the triumph is entirely hers)]
One of her novels, The Fountainhead, was transformed into a Warner Brothers movie with Gary Cooper in 1949:
The Fountainhead
(movie trailer)
It contains the famous courtroom speech, which seems to encapsulate Rand’s philosophy.
Complete and in writing:
Howard Roark's Address to the Jury
Transcript shortened and highlighted, but not changed:
[Remember, this was written in 1949 (!) or even earlier - during or shortly after the second world war, in which she seems to have lost both her parents.]
…
Thousands of years ago, the first man discovered how to make fire. He was probably burned at the stake he had taught his brothers to light, but he left them a gift they had not conceived, and he lifted darkness off the earth.
Throughout the centuries, there were men who took first steps down new roads, armed with nothing but their own vision. The great creators -- the thinkers, the artists, the scientists, the inventors -- stood alone against the men of their time. Every new thought was opposed; every new invention was denounced. But the men of unborrowed vision went ahead. They fought, they suffered, and they paid. But they won.
No creator was prompted by a desire to please his brothers. His brothers hated the gift he offered.
His truth was his only motive.
His work was his only goal.
His work -- not those who used it.
His creation -- not the benefits others derived from it -- the creation which gave form to his truth.
…
Man cannot survive except through his mind. He comes on earth unarmed. His brain is his only weapon. But the mind is an attribute of the individual. There is no such thing as a collective brain. The man who thinks must think and act on his own. The reasoning mind cannot work under any form of compulsion. It cannot be subordinated to the needs, opinions, or wishes of others. It is not an object of sacrifice.
The creator stands on his own judgment; the parasite follows the opinions of others.
The creator thinks; the parasite copies.
The creator produces; the parasite loots.
The creator's concern is the conquest of nature; the parasite's concern is the conquest of men.
The creator requires independence. He neither serves nor rules. He deals with men by free exchange and voluntary choice.
The parasite seeks power. He wants to bind all men together in common action and common slavery. He claims that man is only a tool for the use of others -- that he must think as they think, act as they act, and live in selfless, joyless servitude to any need but his own.
Look at history: Everything we have, every great achievement has come from the independent work of some independent mind. Every horror and destruction came from attempts to force men into a herd of brainless, soulless robots -- without personal rights, without person ambition, without will, hope, or dignity.
It is an ancient conflict. It has another name: "The individual against the collective."
Our country, the noblest country in the history of men, was based on the principle of individualism, the principle of man's "inalienable rights." It was a country where a man was free to seek his own happiness, to gain and produce, not to give up and renounce; to prosper, not to starve; to achieve, not to plunder; to hold as his highest possession a sense of his personal value, and as his highest virtue his self-respect.
Look at the results. That is what the collectivists are now asking you to destroy, as much of the earth has been destroyed.
…
It was believed that my work belonged to others, to do with as they pleased. They had a claim upon me without my consent -- that it was my duty to serve them without choice or reward.
…
I came here to say that I do not recognize anyone's right to one minute of my life, nor to any part of my energy, nor to any achievement of mine -- no matter who makes the claim!
It had to be said: The world is perishing from an orgy of self-sacrificing.
I came here to be heard in the name of every man of independence still left in the world. I wanted to state my terms. I do not care to work or live on any others.
My terms are: A man's RIGHT to exist for his own sake.
¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
Note as an aside:
Those who will concentrate on the negative side of others, do so because it is positive for themselves. This is satanic, as it is as utterly useless as it is empty.
For, as they have no thing positive to show for themselves, concentrating on the positives of others would be negative for them.
It is but vanity, the devil's favorite vice.